A28: Global Warming Part 10: The Conclusion

This will be my last article. 

We see mainstream celebrities exhort to us about the dangers of climate change and the moral imperative to curb our excessive consumption. Let us take a look at their lives shall we? What better place to start then with the poster child of climate activism Leonardo DiCaprio.

Famous for his roles in Titanic and The Wolf of Wall Street, DiCaprio is perhaps the most vocal climate alarmist in Hollywood. He created his own climate change documentary, The 11th Hour, and was awarded the status of “UN Messenger of Peace with a special focus on climate change.” Addressing the UN in September 2014, he preached: 

When the cameras aren’t rolling, however, his lifestyle tells a different story. DiCaprio can be seen cruising on private yachts, or flying among the four houses he owns, scattered on both coasts. One need only to look at his extravagant $32 million yacht vacation in 2024 to see that his activism is merely a costume.

When it comes to private planes, their emissions have increased 46% between 2019-2023 with regular flyers emitting as much as 500 times more than the average person. Yet, we are the big polluters. Spare the sermon.

Next, let’s look at that relatable tech mogul Mark Zuckerberg. Until 2025, he used his site, Facebook, to shield institutional climate narratives from the perspective of skeptics. With a global network of more than 80 independent fact-checkers, who reviewed content in more than 60 languages, they labeled unapproved viewpoints as misinformation: a digital scarlet letter that insured that 95% of users would never even bother to click.

One does question his the sincerity of his green crusade when, in 2024, Zuckerberg purchased LAUNCHPAD, a $300 million, 369-foot mega yacht powered by four MTU engines totaling a staggering 23,384 horsepower.

Meanwhile, these technology titans grant themselves a green pass for their own energy-intensive operations. Meta is building an AI complex in rural Louisiana called Hyperion that will be powered by 10 natural gas power plants. These plants will generate 7.5 gigawatts of electricity (enough to power over 5 million homes) and represent a more than 30% increase of Louisiana's grid capacity. Apparently, this is what saving the environment looks like.

One cannot conclude this assessment without addressing the true King of Climate: Al Gore.

A champion of the Kyoto Protocols, producer of an Oscar-winning film An Inconvenient Truth, and recipient of 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for climate change efforts, no individual has done more for the current climate agenda than Al Gore.

Of course, on the side he has done quite well for himself. On May 22, 2000 his vice president personal finance report disclosed that the value of his assets totaled between $780,000 and $1.9 million. By 2007 however, Gore’s wealth had skyrocketed “well in excess” of $100 million. By 2012, 14 green-tech firms in which Gore invested received or directly benefited from more than $2.5 billion in loans, grants and tax breaks, part of Obama’s historic push to seed a U.S. renewable-energy industry with public money.

Comically, in 2007, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research found that Gore’s 20-room home and pool house devoured nearly 221,000 kilowatt-hours, more than 20 times the national average. 

To finish, in 2013, Al Gore sold his company Current TV for $500 million to Al Jazeera, a news media funded by the government of Qatar. With Gore owning 20 percent, this spelt a $100 million payday. Oil and natural gas make up 60% of Qatar’s GDP and 70% of government revenue, so if this is not selling out to Big Oil, I don’t know what is. 

I hope you are noticing the hypocrisy. All one needs to do is look at their actions to see their true belief in the whole global warming myth. 

We often hear that if we do not act soon we will cross a point of no return. Such claims are not new.

Way back in 1982, the UN had announced a two-decade tipping point for action on environmental issues. Mostafa Tolba, executive director of the UN Environment Program (UNEP), warned:

By the turn of the century a lack of action would bring:

Did the world end? Naturally, there was no admittance of error, they simply moved the goal posts. In 2014, the United Nations again declared a climate tipping point. The world now has a rough deadline for action on climate change. Nations need to take aggressive action in the next 15 years to cut carbon emissions, in order to forestall the worst effects of global warming.

In 2009 NASA scientist and climate expert Dr. James Hansen declared that Obama had only four years to save the Earth. Four years came and went, yet life kept on moving as usual.

Such death scares are the norm, not the exception. Even Prince Charles has made such claims. In 2009 he declared we had only 96 months to stop global warming. In 2015, two years before the deadline, he abandoned his hundred-month countdown and gave the world a reprieve by extending his climate tipping point to 2050.

It is quite the spectacle to hear a lecture on materialism from a man who employs dozens of staff to maintain his estates and spends hundreds of thousands of pounds travelling around the world.

Such claims are not science. Real science requires a testable hypothesis supported by empirical fact. These alarmist fantasies belong to the realm of fiction alongside Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings. But even their fiction has a dark side. Consider some of their scientific solutions:

How about making childbearing a crime:

Professor Matthew Liao of the Center for Bioethics at New York University has promoted a “solution of human engineering” for climate change, involving the “biomedical modification of humans.”

Or consider the World Economic Forum’s latest vanity project: the personal carbon footprint tracker. How long before politicians turn such a tracker into an inescapable carbon tax levied on every breath you take?

Are any of these views remotely rational? However, this is what happens when we get rid of our asylums, and allow the crazies back into civilized society.

The West has been forced to pay billions in reparations to the rest of the world for our so-called White privilege. The climate agenda is no different. Look at the map of per capita emissions to see who they demonize: 

Excuse my language, but I am quite tired of the feeling that our society must be guilt tripped into the moral obligation of endlessly sacrificing to people who do not give a damn whether we or our children live or die. It is a complete perversion of the natural order of the world. In a proper state, the bedrock of society is the family. From there, it expands to immediate communities and eventually to the nation consisting of those who are culturally, religiously, and ethnically similar to ourselves. This is the principle of ordered loves, and only when the first two connections are strong can we then extend our hand to the rest of the world. However, these modern theorists, claim that we should care for those across the Earth than our own flesh and blood.

They act as if there is a magical horn of cornucopia that the West found to flourish, while concealing it from everyone else. This is utter nonsense. Western Civilization has not become what it is by mere chance, but by thousands of years of blood and toil. If we are not careful we shall throw away such heritage to ravenous and ungrateful socities. There is no honor in attempting to achieve that unrealistic notion of ending world poverty when we become destitute ourselves.

Instead of preaching this eternal martyrdom, how about we preach a little personal responsibility. We are not mere products of our circumstances, but the makers of our destiny. If the Hindu, the African, and the rest of the third world cannot build developed nations, there is no one to blame but themselves. We have expended enough effort playing hero, and it is about time for the rest of the world to bear their proper share of the burden.

I should clarify when I say African, I am referring to the people from Africa, not the Black man who has resided in the United States for centuries. They are two different racial groups historically, culturally, and genetically, so they should be treated accordingly. That is why I despise the modern term African American which attempts to conflate a 400-year history with a recent arrival from a foreign continent. I personally prefer the term Negro as I find it much more suave and classy, while being in tune with their unique American experience, but woah, woah, woah—don’t crucify me! I’ll stick with Black.

There is nothing more disgusting about this modern climate dogma than its ruthless assault on our children. As early as kindergarten, these young are land blasted with stories of death and destruction terrifying and burdening them with fear and guilt. 

Every child is told to hate themselves for being born, and by their mere existence must feel an eternal need to pay reparations to the Earth. All this fearmongering was built solely for the profit of a few twisted individuals. What irreparable damage they have done to the youth of this nation. I have never known the depths humanity could sink until now, and it is a struggle to call such perpetrators human. How long shall we leave our children unprotected from these monsters?

It is time to return to the beginning. I began this journey not for my own sake, but for another’s: the Lehigh Formula One Team. When others indulge on the weekends, the team spends theirs diligently tinkering and testing their vehicle to win honors for the school in tough competition. However, Lehigh University is demanding them to go green by switching to an electric battery. In racing, electric batteries are inferior to internal combustion engines; therefore such a change would mean an utter destruction of their club.

Is this because Lehigh wishes to save the environment? Let’s look at their government grants, to see who has their interests compromised.  

What do we have here: a $3 million grant for STAKEHOLDER ENGAGED EQUITABLE DECARBONIZED ENERGY FUTURES. Well that seems like a good use of taxpayer money. How about another:

$442,000 to see  how the Peatlands store or release carbon under warming conditions.  If carbon is not a threat to man, one might question the point of such a grant, but of course Lehigh would never let money dictate their scientific stances. You can love me, you can hate me, but I have not received a cent to support a certain narrative. These are just a few. Check out the grants from your institution, and see how it parallels what they preach. 

More importantly, when I was at Lehigh, I personally filled trash bags with the garbage the school casually ignored. You are telling me an institution that refuses to clean its own backyard, somehow cares about the sustainability of the Earth?

Let’s cut the fake morality. They preach green for money. This whole thing has always been a money game, and if universities were honest about their inflows we might return to education instead of political propaganda. I am so sick and tired of people claiming moral authority of scientific truth when in the process they are filling their own pockets!

There, there is the whole climate change agenda exposed to you. There is the whole truth made bare.

You think revealing a multi-trillion dollar sham would be more exhilarating, but truthfully it is all quite lackluster. Once you understand how one of these industries work, you have understood them all. To write about immigration, nationalistic economic policy, vaccines, or even public enemy number one, would be more of a chore than intellectually stimulating.

I have accomplished all I can possibly achieve will the resources I have, and would not feel shame about ending it here. Therefore, unless the circumstances change this will be the end of David’s Mighty Men.

I would love to help you ladies, however I am not a slave, and have no interest in becoming a martyr for an ungrateful and thankless nation. I am a man, therefore I shall not continue to labor away unless I am properly honored and compensated for my actions.

I have sacrificed just about everything I can, but I am quite hamstrung. Drawing against a made hand, unless society is willing to give me the cards necessary for success, there is Iittle more I can do.

I will not sail in a sinking ship, and if society does not protect its heroes, then I will have to look after myself not temporarily, but permanently. I’m sorry. I would love to aid you, but I must be enabled to do so. 

To the elites: let these articles serve as a warning. If you come after me, I will be ruthless in my defense. However, if you leave me in peace, I shall do likewise.

It is a tragedy, truly, that I was not permitted to serve my nation. But no matter, life goes on. I wish you all the best of luck in your future endeavors. God Bless.

Your Humble and Obedient Servant

 Francisco Pereira