A18: Global Warming: A Last Few Myths

Finally, we return to dash these devious lies that have pervaded the very soul of this nation.

Every year seems to be a new hottest year. The years 2023 and 2024 were record-setting years, and 2025 was the third hottest. What is really going on?

I encourage you, starting from 2025 and going backward, to type into your search engine each year followed by “hottest year” and see what articles appear.

Let’s go to the year 2016, the hottest year on record since 1880. How much hotter was it than 2015? According to the British Met Office a mere 0.01 °C. To put these in perspective, the margin of error on testing is 0.1 °C, meaning any number lower than this cannot be considered a legitimate increase. However, this truth certainly does not stop the media from shouting about new records. (2010 differed from 2005 by 0.018 °F: we’re all going to burn! 🥵).

Yes, we have hotter temperatures then the beginning of the 20th century, but this is not unprecedented; the Medieval Warm Period was hotter than now.

What's worse is that in the parts of the world heating up the most, weather stations are so sparse that only about 25% of the reported numbers come from actual temperatures. That’s right: this so-called heating is based off assumed temperatures, and not even real data!

Now, 2026 is supposed to be another hottest year, yet we should start questioning these claims. With all these snowstorms us in the Eastern United States because certainly could have used some of that global warming. However, we have finished this hottest year claim without touching on that 2 °C number.

We are constantly lectured about the dangers of exceeding two degrees Celsius. Based on the current trends the Earth’s temperature was projected to rise 2.78 °C over the next century. Let’s look at the actual data.

The observed rate is far below the projected value. Nor should such an increase be unexpected, since 1850 marked the end of a Little Ice Age. Nor have temperatures increased steadily; we saw a stagnant trend from October 1996 until the 2015-2016 El Niño.

That’s right for over 18 years there was no increase in global temperatures. Did this cause science to admit error? Nope, they just keep on plugging along, claiming that we will warm 4.8 ºC by 2100, twice the greatest warming rate ever recorded since the 1950’s. If these scientists are this accurate with their predictions, should we give them full power over our politics?

Oh no the great barrier reef what we are to do? With all the bleaching it is sure to end, and beauty of our oceans shall collapse to a sandy wasteland!

According to the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2021), coral reefs are highly sensitive to temperature changes, ocean acidification and pollution. This data has led to predictions to the annihilation of 70–90% of the Great Barrier Reef.

Well, the data paints a different story since far from being destroyed the coral cover is at its highest extent since 1985. The Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) conducts the world’s most rigorous coral reef monitoring program with data stretching back over 36 years. Systematic sampling of 87 representative reefs in the Great Barrier is conducted annually using standardized procedures for consistency. The data shows no long-term correlation between rising temperatures and reduced coral coverage.

Yes, thermal bleaching is real; however, death is not permanent. Coral bleaching is a stress response to warming waters in which coral expels and later replaces symbiotic algae. Contrary to common portrayals, bleached corals often recover after 5-10 years (hence the cyclical nature of the graph).

If you want to read more, check out this study, but I must say these papers are not cheap. Some spend their money on alcohol, others on beauty products, me on coral reef papers. Oh, my sweet land of liberty, how I love you so.

Finally, the last myth on the bucket list, natural disasters. Let’s see if they truly are increasing as claimed.

Let’s start with hurricanes. There has been no dramatic increase of hurricanes in the United States. The worst decade for hurricanes was the 1940s. From Hurricane Wilma (2005) to Hurricane Harvey (2017) we had a twelve-year record-breaking streak going back to the 1900s of no category 3 or higher hurricanes hitting US landfall.

Before you start saying what about the recent category 5’s, hurricane-hunter craft was not developed until the 1940s and first weather satellite until the 1960s, so to say previous decades were undercounted would be quite an understatement.

There has been a downward trend in violent tornadoes (F3-F5) since the 1950’s. These tornadoes have not increased in frequency, intensity or normalized damage. The time from 1986 to 2017 (thirty-one years) there were 40% less tornadoes than from 1954- 1985 even as the Earth increased by 0.7°C.

There has been an increase in the reports of smaller scale tornadoes, but this is due to better surveillance and tracking rather than that laughable theory of a burning Earth.

Across the earth there has been little change in droughts. In truth in the United States droughts, they have become shorter, less frequent, and cover a shorter area over the past century. In 2017, Drought in the U.S. fell to a 17-year record low, with just 6.1% of the lower 48 states currently experiencing such dry conditions.

Even California which is supposedly had record droughts are minor compared to the ancient droughts of 850 to 1090 and 1140 to 1320. I could more into the California droughts, but for the sake of space I’ll leave it that the problems with droughts in California is government-made, and not due to a warming environment.

The number of fires across the world has been decreasing over the centuries, and in the western U.S. there is little change at all. About 4% of global land surface is burned every year, and most have little direct impact on individuals, yet the media tends to only report on the more tragic cases.

Analysis of charcoal in sediments and isotope ratios in ice cores suggest that biomass burning the previous century has been lower than any century in the past 2,000 years. Long term trends suggest that the annual area burned at high severity between 1984 and 2009 was only half that prior to European settlement (approx. 1500–1850), which is associated with an even smaller area burned compared to pre-European times.

Today only 0.4% of wildfires in the United States are allowed to burn, yet in many of these places, fire for a long time has been used in landscape management. Fires are just as unstoppable as Earthquakes and Tornadoes, and a natural part of the Earth’s ecosystem. A 100% exclusion is not a realistic expectation.

Hypothetically, an increase in temperatures should increase the water-holding capacity leading to changes in the amounts of precipitable water. Warming should cause more rain and less snow leading to more floods. Yet we see no change between increases in floods and increases in C0₂, with the Southwest even showing a negative correlation. During this time frame there was a 32% increase in C0₂.

Myths, myths, myths you truly cannot outdo the amount of lying and data manipulation these hotheads will use for their science. Maybe if they took a cold shower every once in a while, they might cool down to reality.

The Earth is getting warmer, yet the ice caps are not melting, the rainforest is not burning, and natural disasters are not at unparalleled heights. Why is all this being shoved down our throats?

Of course, I could not end this article without touching on the more recent news that happened it politics, which is the repeal of the 2009 endangerment, an Obama-era policy, that has been the bedrock of the C0₂ climate regime in Washington.

I will be one to admit that the results of what was promised by the current president to what has been delivered, to put it mildly, has been quite lackluster, yet this event is something substantial. It was this endangerment study, not the Clean Air Act of 1970 that gave the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) the ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

A successful repeal could mean a reduction of $1 trillion in regulations an end to the car mandates and a full EV economy (76% all new cars mandated to be electric in less than ten years), and a reduction of car prices by around $2400 per vehicle.

Of course, unlike most of those mainstream reporters, I read the study and let me she was a thick girl. Her voluptuous, 52 pages were filled with so much vague and worthless information that it seemed much more an attempt to kill the reader’s mind than provide any actual evidence.

I did glean this detail, however: the courts rejected the view that the “EPA had to show proof of actual harm, or probable harm” before passing any policy. That’s right, billion-dollar mandates can be written up all based on theoretical issues, without one actual proof of their harm. Ladies and gentlemen, this is true science!

If we are to save this country, the climate regime must fall. We must tear down enemies’ walls at Jericho and achieve victory. Victory and victory alone. Victory at all costs. The loss that would result in anything less than a complete triumph would be too terrible, too egregious, too repulsive to imagine.

With all vigor and courage in our hearts, we must defy the enemy’s plans, purge the treasonous elements from the nation, and restore the power of the government back to the hands of its rightful descendants. Triumph we must and so triumph we will.

Boretti, A. (2025). Evaluating 38 years of coral coverage trends on the Great Barrier Reef: Insights into resilience and temperature correlation. International Journal of Global Warming, 36(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2025.147639

Morano, Marc. The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change. Regnery Publishing, 2018.